|
Introduction
Check
out the Green Directory
Bioenergy
is energy extracted from biomass, which means any plant derived organic
matter available on a renewable basis, including dedicated energy
crops
and trees, agricultural food and
feed crops, agricultural crop wastes and residues, wood wastes and residues,
aquatic plants, animal wastes, municipal wastes, and other waste
materials.
Traditonally, conventional biomass is considered to come from three distinct
sources: wood, waste, and alcohol fuels as summarized in the Figure
below. 
Source: Energy Information Administration
Wood,
the largest source of bioenergy, has been used to provide heat for
thousands
of years, and is derived both from direct use of harvested wood as a
fuel and from wood waste streams. The largest source of energy from
wood is
pulping liquor or “black liquor,” a waste product from processes
of the pulp, paper and paperboard industry. Waste energy is the second-largest
source of biomass energy. The main contributors of waste energy are municipal
solid waste (MSW), manufacturing waste, and landfill gas. Biomass alcohol
fuel, or ethanol, is derived almost exclusively from corn. Its principal
use is as an oxygenate in gasoline. Biomass
is potentially the world's largest and most sustainable energy source – an
annual renewable resource comprising about 2900 EJ, of which less
than 10% could be considered available on a sustainable basis and
at competitive prices. However even the economically potential 270
EJ/year
is far more than the current 50EJ/year. The problem is not availability
but the sustainable management and delivery of energy to those who
need
it. Although, as explained above, residues are currently the main sources
of bio-energy, dedicated energy forestry/crops will play an increasing
role in the longer term. Already, today, many bioenergy resources
are
replenished through the cultivation of energy crops, such as fast-growing
trees and grasses, called bioenergy feedstocks. The expected increase
of biomass energy, particularly in its modern forms, could have a
significant
impact not only in the energy sector, but also in the drive to modernise
agriculture, and on rural development. Biomass
(organic matter) can be used to provide heat, generate electricity and
provide chemical feedstock. . Also, unlike other renewable energy sources,
biomass can be converted directly into liquid or gaseous fuels for our
transportation needs. The two most common biofuels are ethanol and biodiese
although hydrogen and methane are also possible biofuels.

McNeil
Power Plant, Vt (Woodchip)
Source: National Engineering LAboratory Photographic Information Exchange
Historical
Growth Electricity
generation from solid biomass grew from 59.5 TWh to 79.6 TWh between
1990
and 2001, yielding a 2.7% average annual growth. As the second largest
renewable electricity source after hydropower, solid biomass accounted
for 5.6% of renewable electricity generation in 2001. This share
is up
from 4.6% in 1990. 52.3% of electricity from solid biomass is generated
in the United States (41.6 TWh), where it makes up 14.6% of the country’s
renewable electricity production. The second largest producer of
electricity
from solid biomass is Finland (8.2 TWh), where it represents 37.8% of
renewable electricity supply. Other big producers are Japan and Canada.
Solid biomass electricity is produced in most OECD Member countries.
However,
as shown below, the actual primary energy production from solid biomass
did not change markedly over the period since much of it is used
in the
less developed world for heating and cooking.
Renewable
municipal solid waste represented 2.3% of renewable electricity generation
in 2001. IEA analysis suggests that a major part of the production reported
under renewable municipal solid waste in fact belongs in non-renewable
municipal solid waste. In 2001, 33 379 GWh of electricity were produced
from renewable solid waste in the OECD. By far the largest producer of
electricity from renewable municipal solid waste is the United States,
generating 16 818 GWh, or 50.4% of OECD production. The second largest
producer is Japan, with a production of 5 338 GWh. With 2 044 GWh, Germany
represents the third largest producer. The remaining electricity production
from renewable municipal solid waste is spread among smaller producers
in OECD Europe. Denmark and Italy experienced the highest growth rates,
increasing their production from 47 GWh to 1 068 GWh (at 32.8% per annum)
and from 71 GWh to 1 258 GWh (at 29.9% per annum) respectively between
1990 and 2001.
Source: International Energy Agency 2002
The contribution
fro renewable municipal waste is barely visible above since it is so much
smaller than solid biomass, and Biomass gas and liquid biofuels are even
smaller! They are therefore shown separately below. In terms of primary
energy production, the renewable municipal wastes contribution doubled
over the period.
Source: International Energy Agency 2002
Biogas
primary energy production grew from virtually zero in 1992 to surpass
renewable municipal wastes in 2002. Electricity production from biogas
grew from an estimated 5 000 GWh in 1990 to 13 617 GWh in 2001. While
in the early 1990’s, nearly the entire amount of biogas electricity
was produced in the United States, the largest proportion of this
production
has moved to OECD Europe, which contributes 58.1% of biogas electricity
today. Most production takes place in the member countries of the
European
Union. The largest producer in the European Union is the United Kingdom,
which provided 2 870 GWh of biogas electricity in 2001. While the
United
States, with 4 860 GWh, remains the largest individual producer, its
growth of 5.4% per annum since 1992 has been much slower than that
of many European
Union countries. Germany has an average annual growth rate of 22.7% (reaching
1 986 GWh in 2001), Italy of 55.3% (684 GWh) and France of 19.8%
(601
GWh) since 1992. Most of the growth in the biogas segment has taken place
in the late 1990s and early 2000s, and continued strong growth is
expected
for the near future. 2. Due to unavailability of data, all growth rates
in this paragraph were calculated taking 1992 as the base year instead
of 1990.
Over the same period, liquid biofuels grew from 7TJ in 1990 to almost 7400TJ in 2002!
As already mentioned,
the USA figures significantly in biomass usage and the two figures below
illustrate how its use has changed recently. Only alcohol fuels have grown
significantly, having risen from about 100 trillion Btu in 1998 to over
150 trillion Btu in 2002.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Renewable Energy Annual 2002
Source: Energy Information Administration, Renewable Energy Annual 2002
Jobs
There
are important job creation benefits to be gained from increased use of
renewable energy technologies. Employment is created at different levels,
from research and manufacturing to services, such as installers and distributors.
There are many jobs available in the service industries, from sales to
consulting, research, engineering, and installation through to maintenance.
One
study funded by the European Union indicates 515,000 new European jobs
from biomass fuel production by 2020. The study found that renewable energy
technologies are more labor intensive than conventional technologies for
the same energy output. In Brazil, over 700,000 rural jobs have been created
in the sugar-alcohol industry.
Biomass
technologies can have a major impact on creating new jobs and improving
local economies in rural America. The National Energy Policy supports
an increased role for biomass technologies, citing its benefits including
new sources of income for farmers, land-owners, and others who harness
biomass resources. To date, over 66,000 rural jobs have been created in
the production of 75GW of biopower and over 40,000 jobs in biofuels. Overall,
rural economies benefit through,
• Increased
demand for crops and biomass waste,
• New jobs,
• New investments in rural economies, and
• Improved energy security and environment.
The
Future Biomass
Growth
Renewable
energy will play a growing role in the world ’s primary energy mix.
Non-hydro renewables, will grow faster than any other primary energy source,
at an average rate of 3.3%per year over the period to 2030. Wind power
and biomass will grow most rapidly, especially in OECD countries. However
non-hydro renewables will still make only a small dent in global energy
demand in 2030,because they start from a very low base. . Poor people
in developing countries rely heavily on traditional biomass – wood,
agricultural residues and dung – for their basic energy needs. According
to information specifically collected for this WEC study (World Energy
Outlook 2002), 2.4 billion people in developing countries use only such
fuels for cooking and heating. Many of them suffer from ill-health effects
associated with the inefficient use of traditional biomass fuels. Over
half of all people relying heavily on biomass live in India and China,
but the proportion of the population depending on biomass is heaviest
in sub-Saharan Africa. The share of the world ’s population relying
on biomass for cooking and heating is projected to decline in most developing
regions, but the total number of people will rise. Most of the increase
will occur in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Over 2.6 billion people
in developing countries will continue to rely on biomass for cooking
and
heating in 2030. That is an increase of more than 240 million, or 9%.
In developing countries, biomass use will still represent over half of
residential energy consumption in 2030.
The
data from World Energy Outlook 2002 is not yet freely available so the
figures below are based on an earlier report. The data shows biomass growth
will be greatest in the OECD, particularly Europe and North America. There
will also however be high growth in Latin America and South Asia. The
pattern is similar for biopower generation.
Source: IEA World Enrgy Outlook 2000
The 2020
capacity projections for the non-OECD countries, shown separately below,
clearly shows the relative importance of Latin America and the emergence
of China and Africa.
Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2000
Bringing power to
those without it, especially in China, India and Africa, will require
not only time and money, but also new technological approaches:
One
which has been proposed is micro power, or distributed generation, on-site
generation, small-scale generation, self-generation, which offers the
potential for a much cleaner environment. For the two billion people who
remain without electricity, micro-power may represent one of their best
hopes since the trend towards more open, decentralised, competitive electricity
systems, may present many opportunities for the introduction of small-scale
power. Proponents of micro-turbines believe that this technology will
revolutionise the power industry. Micro-power technologies can use renewable
sources, e.g. small gasifier applications, as is the case in China and
India. Ranging from 15 to 500 kW, these turbines have the advantage of
being low-cost, easy to manufacture, long-lived, and simple to operate
and maintain. The current biomass-based technology mostly used for distributed
power is a fixed downdraft gasifier coupled with an internal combustion
engine. Recent market projections indicate that the market for generators
below 10 MW could represent a significant proportion of the 200 GW of
new capacity added by 2003 worldwide, compared to the 17-35 GW estimated
potential in 1999.
Tri-generation
is also a new concept, which could potentially bring major benefits to
many rural areas. Village-scale tri-generation, based on gasification
of crop residues and use of microturbines for CHP, is said to offer a
major promise in achieving multiple economic and environmental goals for
rural development simultaneously. For example, the potential tri-generation
based on surplus residues in China alone has been estimated at 22 GWe.
Other wood-based technologies which are developing rapidly include woodchip
boilers, two-stage combustion log boilers, catalytic stoves, wood pellet
boilers and two-stage combustion stoves.
The
long term outlook for bioenergy development is for ‘biorefineries’ that
produce solid, gaseous and liquid fuels and chemicals using biological
and/or thermal conversion processes. Although the main feedstocks
in the
developed world are currently residues from forest, agricultural and
municipal activities, biomass feedstocks could also come from energy
crops that
are genetically modified and grown on marginal, or surplus farmlands.
Biomass-fired power plants will evolve to combined heat and power
plants.
They will become modular, distributed power systems. The stated goal
in the US is to triple the use of bioenergy and bio-based products
by 2010,
while the long-term goal of the EU is to reach a potential 20% of current
primary energy supply. Japan is also looking for significant increase
of biomass use for energy. <
p align="justify">Iin
the USA, projections indicate that bioenergy from municipal solid waste
will increase by 50% by 2010 and remain relatively constant thereafter.
Bioenergy from solid biomass however will continue to increase, virtually
doubling by 2025.

Source: Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2004
Jobs Growth The
National Renewable Energy Laboratory reports that for every megawatt of
biomass power produced, 4.9 jobs are created while the Department of Agriculture
predicts that 17,000 jobs will be created per every million gallons of
ethanol produced. Given the rapid growth demonstrated in biofuels this
can only be good news for the employment prospects. The
U.S. Department of Energy predicts that advanced technologies currently
under development will help the biomass power industry install over 13,000
megawatts of biomass power by the year 2010, with over 40% of the fuel
supplied from four million acres of energy crops and the remainder from
biomass residues, and create an additional 100,000 jobs. This would significantly
help rural economies. In
Europe, predictions estimate that the increase in energy provided from
biomass fuel production could result in the creation of over 515,000 new
jobs by 2020. This prediction took account of the direct, indirect and
subsidy effects on employment, and jobs displaced in conventional energy
technologies.
References
and Useful Links
|